Personal Injury Podcast

« FAQ: Can I supervise the defense of my case? | Main | New Report »

More on aftermarket parts

I read an interesting story this morning from Chron.com. It talks about aftermarket parts. A Portland, OR family found out about the cost of repairing their Honda car. The Honda dealer wanted over $5,000 and they found two other shops with two other estimates. The adjuster wrote a fourth estimate with a fourth price.

One of the differences: the adjuster wanted to use aftermarket parts and the shops did not. There is some concern that aftermarket parts do not fit as well, are not as reliable and cause more problems. CAPA, the trade group for aftermarket parts, disagrees.

My thought is that there is a time and place for aftermarket parts. If I had a car that would be considered a total loss if new, factory parts are put on the car, but it could be repairable and not considered a total loss with aftermarket parts, I would use aftermarket parts in a minute. But, if the insurance company wants to force them down my throat so that they can save money, then that is not acceptable.

You pay insurance for yoru car to be fixed and put back in the condition it was in prior to the accident. Your car did not have aftermarket parts before the accident and it should not have them after. Make them use factory parts to fix your car.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/559870/5197120

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More on aftermarket parts:

Comments

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Multi-RSS

  • Subscribe to RSS Feed

DISCLAIMER

  • Notice
    This blog is made available by the lawyer publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. Jonathan G. Stein, is licensed to practice law in the state of California only.