Avvo Rating

  • Avvo Rating for Jonathan G. Stein

Personal Injury Podcast

« Insurance Company Blackmail? | Main | A Response to Garamendi's Charges »

Insurance Company Blackmail? Part 2

In a doozy of a follow up, Insurance Commissioner Garamendi has sent a letter to the FBI, US Attorney and California Attorney General requesting an investigation of this attempted blackmail.

Now, the cynical side of me has two reactions: First, this is an awful lot of PR for a guy running for office, and any publicity is good publicity if you are running for office.

Second, if this weren't true, why are the insurance company PR machines not running full speed ahead to kill this story? If someone accused me of attempted blackmail of a public official and it weren't true (which it wouldn't be), I would go on a full court press to disprove it. However, the insurance companies, who get press on a regular basis just for breathing it seems, are being awfully quiet about this topic.

I don't really care where you fall on the political spectrum. If the insurance industry really attempted to manipulate the system, it seems to me that a full investigation is warranted. Of course, this is also a reason why the insurance commission should not be an elected official and should be listed behind "Quackenbush, C."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c6e4553ef00d834267d2353ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Insurance Company Blackmail? Part 2:

» If This Be Extortion . . . . from Declarations and Exclusions
And now, another lengthy post as DecsExcs makes a foray into investigative journalism: Yesterday, I began reporting on Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi's allegation that he was being blackmailed by representatives of the insurance industry, and hi... [Read More]

Comments

Harvey -

Thanks for the comment. I am concerned that the insurance companies control the Department of Insurance. Speaking from experience, there are many more violations than the Department looks at, and part of it, to me, is that the Commissioner is either running for office.

Jonathan

The voters were right to make the office directly accountable to themselves. If they hadn't this kind of corruption - which occurs every day in Sacramento - would never have been exposed. The solution to corruption is not less democracy, it's an investigation and prosecution.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Multi-RSS

  • Subscribe to RSS Feed

DISCLAIMER

  • Notice
    This blog is made available by the lawyer publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. Jonathan G. Stein, is licensed to practice law in the state of California only. ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT